 |
 |
| |
| Departments |
Home
Columns, Special
Topics & Features:
The Columns:
Angels, Guides, &
Loving Spirits:
Angel Blessings:
with Dr. Doreen Virtue
Ask Valerie Morrison,
Internationally
Acclaimed Psychic
Trust Your Vibes
By Dr. Sonia Choquette, PhD.
Internationally Acclaimed Psychic Healer & Author
Astrologer's Notes:
Carin Martin,
Astrologer
Donna Cunningham, MSW, Astrologer
Basil Fearrington,
Astrologer
Diana Stone,
Astrologer &
Huna Shaman
Jeff Jawer
Astrologer
Glenn Perry,
Astrologer
Ray Merriman,
Financial Astrology:
MMA Market Week
Noel Tyl,
Astrologer
Daily Aspect Calendar
by Care
MoonWatching with Dana Gerhardt and Friends
Creating Bridges:
The Spiritual &
Philosophical
Act of Power
Discovering the Key to Living Your Sacred Dream
by Lynn Andrews
Avant-Gardening:
Insights
by Frank &
Vicky Giannangelo
From The Heart:
Alan Cohen
Teachings from the Western Mystery Traditions: The Esoteric "Paths of Return"
by Jacquelyn Small, Eupsychia
Spirituality in Daily Life: by Bhikshuni Thubten Chodron
The Conscious Column
by David Ault
Spiritual Mastery
for the 21st Century
Dr. Gwen MacGregor
Encounters on the
Shaman's Path with
Dr. Hank Wesselman, PhD.
Anthropologist, Zoologist, Author, Shamanic Healer & Teacher
The Divine Human
by Ornesha De Paoli
Awakenings
by Karen Johnson
Worshipping by Wondering with
Sankara Saranam, MA Founder of the Pranayama Institute
Wisdom Walks in Circles
by Margaret Lewis
Author & Shamanic Practitioner:
The Awakening Generation
by Ann Marie Judge
Water For The Dry Sponge: Chronicles and Essays
by Shaun Brown,
Be Well Publications
Crystals, Minerals
& Gemstones
Light and Love with Crystals, Minerals & Gemstones
by Raven,
Raven Crystals
Furry & Feathered Family Members:
Dr. Carson's Holistic Animal Care
by Dr. Kathleen Carson, D.V.M.
Animal Insights
by Charlene Boyd, Animal Communicator,
talk-to-animals.com
Healing & Alternative
Health:
"Spirit and Practice
of the Wise Woman
Tradition"
By Susun Weed
The Holistic Mystic,
by Lonny Brown
Medical Intuition: Tune
in to Your Body and Improve Your Health
by Caroline Sutherland, Sutherland Communications
Transformational Healing through the Violet Flame!
by Eva Kettles
Herbs for Health
with Kami McBride
Cure Your Cravings
...For Life
Rena Greenberg,
Practitioner of Neuro Linguistic Programming & Hypnotherapist
Humor:
Wake Up Laughing.Com:
Swami Beyondananda
Interviews:
Watch for Upcoming Announcements
Kabbalah:
Kabbalah Revealed:
Rav Michael Laitman, PhD, Kabbalalist
Numberscope Forecast
by Vincent J. Barra
Oracle & Divination Systems:
Be Your Own Oracle
by James Wanless, Ph.D. Creator of the Voyager Tarot Deck
Resources:
Archives
Blessings & Messages
The Book Nook
The Directory
Event Calendar
Historical Notes & Data
The MetaPersonals
Tarot:
Moment to Moment
by Gigi Miner
Author, Tarot Consultant, & Teacher
Reviews:
Tarot, Cartomancy,
Oracle Decks,
Books, & Software.
by Bonnie Cehovet,
Tarot Educator
Tidbits:
Almanac of the Ancients
by TripleMoonGoddess
News Briefs
Op-Ed
Pearls of Wisdom
by Astro Aeon
& Astro Care
Symbols, Seals,
Amulets & Talismans
The What in the
World Department
Trivia & Life's Other
Novel Moments
General Information:
Advertising Information & Opportunities:
The Directory Advertising Rates
Premium Pages:
Groups 1, 2 & Display
Advertising Rates
The BookNook
Advertising Rates
About
The Meta Arts Magazine
Editorial Submission
Information:
Contact Us
Legal Notices
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Creating Bridges: Spirituality & Philosophy:
Worshipping by Wondering with Sankara Saranam
Science Without Religion
|
|
 |
by Sankara Saranam |
|
|
Become a deep thinker, offer a little sage advice, and you have a sure fire formula for being misunderstood. If you look at Einstein’s comments on religion as an example, the mischaracterizations never seem to end.
A popular belief is that Einstein was a religious man. He certainly used the word religion enough, but if one studies the context in which he writes on religion, it becomes evident he is not speaking of centralized religion, and certainly not monotheistic religion. Einstein is talking about ethics, which he loosely equated with religion because it was common to do so in his time. Still, he was referring to general human spirituality, which in his day was represented by religion.
One of Einstein’s most oft-quoted phrases (“Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.”) speaks of the shortcomings of science without religion, and the blindness of religion without science. Einstein applied the scientific method as his preferred avenue to material knowledge, but he did not consider it useful in determining right from wrong. He generally referred to the practice of thinking about life and applying oneself to an inclusive ethical system, whether it came from a secular philosopher or the Bible, as “religion.” Atheists and non-theists, to him, could therefore be religious.
At the same time, Einstein embraced reason, not revelation. Existence itself was God to him. He was awed by God’s order as it appeared before his reason, not before blind belief or faith. Like the 17th century Dutch philosopher, Baruch Spinoza, the Bible to Einstein was cultural literature, not the dogmatic word of God.
Einstein had no use for the concept of a personal God, either. Like Spinoza, he too was a pantheist. In fact, he believed it the duty of priests to reject the monotheistic God that fostered exclusiveness and that was separate from humanity and the world. Einstein strongly felt that priests would fail their calling as teachers of morality unless they rejected a personal God.
In speaking of his own Jewish religion, Einstein had little tolerance for the concept of a Chosen People. He considered it the immature divinization of a clan, just as nationalism was to him a psychological disease befitting a childish humanity.
If there was a high religious, meaning ethical, imperative to Einstein, it was to establish a multinational organization whose unifying purpose was to prevent war. A staunch pacifist who considered Gandhi an exemplary spiritual leader, Einstein’s greatest fear was the near destruction of the human race through nuclear weapons.
But Einstein’s “religion” of self-expansion and selfless service to humanity, combined with freedom from narrow religious and nationalistic identities and the resulting unity of the human race, is not one that many find a comfortable fit. Liberation from the narrow sense of self, which Einstein believed was the true measure of a human being, is not a religion most people aspire toward. It is easier to be divisive and exclusive because being so easily justifies selfish materialistic ambitions.
The challenge is that if Einstein is right, then his sense of religion is our best and only hope; and we’re finding that he’s increasingly right each day, even when we thought he was wrong. Will the leaders of nations, churches, and corporations heed his warning?
Einstein’s faith in science as the way to understand how the world works, and lack of faith in science as the way to understand right from wrong, points out a crucial distinction that clears the dust kicked up by our current cultural war. When a religious concept does not engage the questions of ethics, it has no place in religious discourse because all religious engagement must eventually, in some way, inform the distinction between right and wrong. Religion has no place in discussing material science, and when it does, it perverts the quest for sound ethics, usually transforming it into a political tool to incite divisiveness and promote wrongdoing and ignorance. This can be no clearer than in the issue of teaching Intelligent Design as an alternative to the theory of evolution.
We’ve probably all heard some of the past religious beliefs, posing as scientific theories, concerning what the world rests on. There’s Atlas’ shoulder, begging the question, “What’s Atlas standing on?” Then there’s the comforting children’s song, “He’s got the whole world in his hands.” And there’s the turtle theory: The world is sitting on the back of a turtle, and it’s turtles all the way down but down to what?
The human mind can’t fathom the noumenon; it can only handle the world of phenomenon. The mind is limited by space, time, and causation; therefore, eternities, infinitudes, and first causes are not in its purview. Hence, these concepts are not in the purview of science either. At the same time, the concept religious leaders repeatedly miss is that these issues can only enter a theological discussion when they pertain to an ethical imperative, and more specifically, one that reveals the unity of humanity and inspires selfless service and the obliteration of the narrow sense of identity. Creating gods, make-believe first causes, and infinities is only legitimate when the resulting myth psychologically engenders a sense of self in the seeker that is above divisiveness.
Intelligent Design has as little to do with science as the ancient Hindu “Cosmic Egg” creation story. The mind will always look for the chicken that laid the egg, and there is no chicken. There’s just the egg. One can marvel at the “grandeur of reason incarnate in existence,” to quote Einstein, but the mind can’t say a peep about the absolute nature of the Reasoner behind it all, even if there is one. If scientists happen to be inspired by one or another ancient myth, or by the wonder of the order and intelligence in the universe during their research hours, that’s great. But that is as far as science and the mind can go.
Intelligent Design is a failure as a scientific theory for these reasons, and as it expected, its source myth engenders a narrow self and unethical behavior. No wonder it has translated in real terms into a shoddy political attempt to dumb down an entire nation; and attempts at promoting it have led to disingenuous behavior, mendacity, and generally immoral political practices.
We might very well become the laughing stock of the world if we did something as scientifically suicidal as give “both sides,” as President Bush, who never worked a day in his life as a scientist, urges. There are no “both sides” to this issue at all. There may be many minor sides in the scientific community when it comes to the details of evolution, but the case is closed, and Intelligent Design, along with Genesis, Creationism, the virgin birth, the Cosmic Egg,
Zeus on Olympus, and Ptah and Osiris, belongs in the humanities department of schools under the heading, “Some strange and interesting things human beings once believed, or still believe.”
The religious right hated that abortion was made nationally legal by the judiciary and not the legislative branch of government, which means by a select few. The religious right probably feels the same way about the few elite scientists that keep creationism out of science courses. But extreme religionists have it backwards, both intellectually and ethically, and this is the likely reason science bothers them so much. They are in the minority, and it is they, more than anyone, who consider themselves the elite, the saviors, and the chosen by (their) God.
Only someone with a savior complex would be attracted to the worship of an image of God that is the only true savior of the world, relegating the rest of humanity to ignorance and suffering for being to spiritually dense to get the “good news.” Only those so cocksure of themselves would ever think to push Intelligent Design into science classes and evolution out by political means, demeaning science as the work of peons who don’t spiritually know any better, but who had better forget evolution and get busy with real science such as making fun new gadgets they can buy at the real center of our materialistic lives, Wal-Mart America’s true church.
Scientists like Einstein know that such cocksurety is the kiss of death to the scientific method because it limits the questions one is willing and able to ask, let alone research to find answers. But no surprise there. When’s the last time anyone heard of a scientific breakthrough occurring through Bible study or Mass? Indeed, it is revelation that prevented scientific investigation and understanding. Since religion has been with us for centuries, it’s natural that many scientists, like Einstein, will have been raised to believe, or at least be accustomed, to religious doctrines and verbiage. But even when they gave credit to God or faith, behind that humility is years and years of the real fire of penance research. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sankara Saranam,
Ascetic, Mystic, Author, and Teacher
|
 |
Sankara Saranam is an ascetic, mystic, teacher, and author of the award-winning book "GOD WITHOUT RELIGION: Questioning Centuries of Accepted Truths" (with a foreword by Arun Gandhi, grandson of the Mahatma). He is also founder of the Pranayama Institute, where he devotes his life to making pranayama techniques available worldwide at no cost.
Sankara is author of the award-winning book GOD WITHOUT RELIGION:Questioning Centuries of Accepted Truths with a foreword by Arun Gandhi, grandson of the Mahatma. In God Without Religion, Sankara shows why organized religion has long been the cause of humanity’s worst wars and most acute sufferingthen guides us beyond our divisive history into more expansive perceptions capable of creating a unified, peaceful future. Through a series of penetrating inquiries and practices, readers are invited to examine their beliefs, turn inward, and develop a direct understanding of God.
“It’s possible to enhance your spiritual well-being simply by being curious,” Saranam explains. “Unquestioningly accepting inherited beliefs about God promotes a narrow view of yourself and the world. To expand your perspective, worship by wondering. The more questions you ask, the more profound the answers will be, leading to deeper questions. Constantly challenging your conclusions and refining your knowledge of God promotes deep spiritual growth that takes into account the well-being of all of life.”
For more information and a flash movie about the book, please visit:
www.godwithoutreligion.
com.
Writer and researcher, world traveler and lecturer, Sankara also playsclassical guitar, composes music, and writes poetry. He currently resides in a log cabin in northern Georgia with his wife and their young son. Information about his speaking engagements and teachings can be found at The Pranayama Institute's Web sites:
www.pranayama.org
and
www.godwithoutreligion.
com.
|
 |
You'll find it in The
Directory! |
|
|
|
 |